<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Souza AS</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Oberauer K</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">We investigated the role of two kinds of attention-visual and central attention-for the maintenance of visual representations in working memory (WM). In Experiment 1 we directed attention to individual items in WM by presenting cues during the retention interval of a continuous delayed-estimation task, and instructing participants to think of the cued items. Attending to items improved recall commensurate with the frequency with which items were attended (0, 1, or 2 times). Experiments 1 and 3 further tested which kind of attention-visual or central-was involved in WM maintenance. We assessed the dual-task costs of two types of distractor tasks, one tapping sustained visual attention and one tapping central attention. Only the central attention task yielded substantial dual-task costs, implying that central attention substantially contributes to maintenance of visual information in WM. Experiment 2 confirmed that the visual-attention distractor task was demanding enough to disrupt performance in a task relying on visual attention. We combined the visual-attention and the central-attention distractor tasks with a multiple object tracking (MOT) task. Distracting visual attention, but not central attention, impaired MOT performance. Jointly, the three experiments provide a double dissociation between visual and central attention, and between visual WM and visual object tracking: Whereas tracking multiple targets across the visual filed depends on visual attention, visual WM depends mostly on central attention.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://sonar.ch/global/documents/128391</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3758/s13414-017-1357-y</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/28600676</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics. - 2017</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Attention</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Dual-task costs</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Multiple object tracking</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Refreshing</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Working memory</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Attention</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Cues</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">Female</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns9="xml" ns9:lang="en">Humans</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns10="xml" ns10:lang="en">Male</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns11="xml" ns11:lang="en">Memory, Short-Term</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns12="xml" ns12:lang="en">Mental Recall</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns13="xml" ns13:lang="en">Photic Stimulation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns14="xml" ns14:lang="en">Psychomotor Performance</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns15="xml" ns15:lang="en">Visual Perception</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns16="xml" ns16:lang="en">Young Adult</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns17="xml" ns17:lang="en">The contributions of visual and central attention to visual working memory.</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
