Deplazes-Zemp A 2019 In this article, I discuss access and benefit-sharing (ABS) for plant genetic resources from an ethical perspective. This leads to the question of what types of justice actually play a role when more equity and fairness is demanded for plant genetic resources. Five dimensions of justice will be distinguished: classical distributive justice, which deals with a fair distribution of goods; commutative justice, which concerns a fair exchange of "give-and-receive"; justice as recognition, which relates to treating all involved parties with the same respect; reparative justice, which pertains to fair amendments for wrongful actions in the past; and procedural justice, which is concerned with just decision processes. Drawing on the discussion of ethical problems with biopiracy, the distribution of environmental burdens, and plant genetic resources in agriculture, I will illustrate that the use of genetic resources poses challenges across all five dimensions of justice. Because the combination of justice challenges is specific for each case of resource use, I will argue that it is important that users of genetic resources are aware of the complexity of justice problems to ensure fair and equitable ABS negotiations. application/pdf https://sonar.ch/global/documents/169134 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpls.2019.01266 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/31708939 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Frontiers in plant science. - 2019 Convention on Biological Diversity access and benefit-sharing commutative justice distributive justice environmental justice genetic resources Challenges of Justice in the Context of Plant Genetic Resources. http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501