<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Nambiar AK</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Lemack GE</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Chapple CR</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Burkhard FC</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">This article summarises the European Association Urology guidelines position on the role of urodynamic studies in investigating the problem of urinary incontinence. The guidelines recommend that urodynamics should not be necessary to help decide the best treatment for uncomplicated urinary incontinence, but may help if there is any uncertainty over the choice of invasive treatments. The guidelines also stress the importance of conducting urodynamic tests to the highest possible quality standards for the results to be useful in the decision-making process.</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://sonar.ch/global/documents/185025</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.045</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/27726965</dc:relation>
  <dc:source>European urology. - 2017</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Clinical Decision-Making</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Europe</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Humans</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Societies, Medical</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Urinary Incontinence</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Urodynamics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Urology</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">The Role of Urodynamics in the Evaluation of Urinary Incontinence: The European Association of Urology Recommendations in 2016.</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>