<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Finckh A</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tramèr MR</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2010</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">a meta-epidemiological study has revealed that the inclusion of small studies in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis interventions could lead to an overestimation of the benefit of these interventions. Does this mean meta-analyses should be restricted to trials with large sample sizes?</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://sonar.ch/global/documents/221769</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.162</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/21037558</dc:relation>
  <dc:source>Nature reviews. Rheumatology. - 2010</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Humans</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Meta-Analysis as Topic</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Osteoarthritis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Publication Bias</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Reproducibility of Results</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Sample Size</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">Treatment Outcome</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns9="xml" ns9:lang="en">Osteoarthritis: Small studies overestimate the benefit of therapies for OA.</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>