<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Sampaio FBWR</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Özcan M</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Gimenez TC</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Moreira MSNA</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tedesco TK</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Morimoto S</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite inlays, onlays, and overlays manufactured according to different methods (CAD/CAM, pressable, and stratified). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for published articles. Risk of bias, data extraction, subgroup analysis, meta-analysis, and GRADE was performed.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
Prospective, retrospective, or RCT studies, without restriction of language, from 1983 to 2019, with follow-up ≥5 years, reporting survival rates were screened independently by two reviewers in accordance with eligibility criteria.


RESULTS
A total of 13 articles (12 for ceramic, one for indirect composite) met the inclusion criteria. No articles were included regarding crystalline ceramic. The estimated cumulative survival rate for CAD/CAM was 97% after 5 years and 89% after 10 years; for pressable was 95% after 5 years, and for stratified was 88% after 5 years and 93% after 10 years.


CONCLUSIONS
Regardless of the manufacturing method, vitreous ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays showed high survival, providing evidence that these restorations are a safe treatment.


CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Vitreous ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays showed high survival, regardless of the manufacturing method, providing evidence that these restorations are a safe treatment.</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://sonar.ch/global/documents/235967</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/jerd.12555</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/31840412</dc:relation>
  <dc:source>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]. - 2019</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">ceramics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">composite resin</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">inlays</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">survival analysis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">systematic review</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Ceramics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Composite Resins</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">Dental Porcelain</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns9="xml" ns9:lang="en">Dental Restoration Failure</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns10="xml" ns10:lang="en">Prospective Studies</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns11="xml" ns11:lang="en">Retrospective Studies</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns12="xml" ns12:lang="en">Survival Rate</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns13="xml" ns13:lang="en">Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>