<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Gagliardini, P</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Gourieroux, C</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Rubin, M</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2019</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">&lt;jats:title&gt;Abstract&lt;/jats:title&gt;
               &lt;jats:p&gt;We study positional portfolio management strategies in which the manager maximizes an expected utility function written on the cross-sectional rank (position) of the portfolio return. The objective function reflects the manager’s goal to be well-ranked among competitors. To implement positional allocation strategies, we specify a nonlinear unobservable factor model for the asset returns which disentangles the dynamics of the cross-sectional distribution and the dynamics of the ranks of the individual assets. Using a large dataset of stocks returns we find that positional strategies outperform standard momentum, reversal and mean-variance allocation strategies, as well as equally weighted portfolio for criteria based on position.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://sonar.ch/global/documents/41227</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/jjfinec/nbz022</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1479-8409</dc:relation>
  <dc:source>Journal of Financial Econometrics. - Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2019</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Economics and Econometrics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Finance</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Positional Portfolio Management*</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
