<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Kiessling C</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tsimtsiou Z</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Essers G</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>van Nuland M</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Anvik T</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bujnowska-Fedak MM</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Hovey R</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Joakimsen R</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Perron NJ</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Rosenbaum M</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Silverman J</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2017</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">OBJECTIVES
Assessment of clinical communication helps teachers in healthcare education determine whether their learners have acquired sufficient skills to meet the demands of clinical practice. The aim of this paper is to give input to educators when planning how to incorporate assessment into clinical communication teaching by building on the authors' experience and current literature.


METHODS
A summary of the relevant literature within healthcare education is discussed, focusing on what and where to assess, how to implement assessment and how to choose appropriate methodology.


RESULTS
Establishing a coherent approach to teaching, training, and assessment, including assessing communication in the clinical context, is discussed. Key features of how to implement assessment are presented including: establishing a system with both formative and summative approaches, providing feedback that enhances learning and establishing a multi-source and longitudinal assessment program.


CONCLUSIONS
The implementation of a reliable, valid, credible, feasible assessment method with specific educational relevance is essential for clinical communication teaching.


PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS
All assessment methods have strengths and limitations. Since assessment drives learning, assessment should be aligned with the purpose of the teaching program. Combining the use of different assessment formats, multiple observations, and independent measurements in different settings is advised.</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://sonar.ch/global/documents/46692</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.027</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/28396057</dc:relation>
  <dc:source>Patient education and counseling. - 2017</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Assessment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Clinical communication</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Communication skills</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Feedback</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Formative</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">Summative</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Communication</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">Competency-Based Education</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns9="xml" ns9:lang="en">Education, Medical, Undergraduate</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns10="xml" ns10:lang="en">Educational Measurement</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns11="xml" ns11:lang="en">Faculty, Medical</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns12="xml" ns12:lang="en">Feedback</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns13="xml" ns13:lang="en">Learning</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns14="xml" ns14:lang="en">Program Evaluation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns15="xml" ns15:lang="en">Students, Medical</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns16="xml" ns16:lang="en">Teaching</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns17="xml" ns17:lang="en">General principles to consider when designing a clinical communication assessment program.</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
