<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Kümmerli R</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Ross-Gillespie A</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2014</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">Over the past decade, there has been enormous interest in understanding the great diversity of microbial cooperative behaviors, including communication, group-based swarming, fruiting-body formation, and the secretion of group-beneficial enzymes and food-scavenging molecules. Zhang and Rainey, henceforth Z&amp;R, recently contended that sociomicrobiologists have been overzealous in their casting of microbes as inherently social organisms, and too hasty in interpreting microbial behaviors in a social evolutionary framework. This challenge accompanied a set of experiments in which they revisited one of the best-studied social behaviors in bacteria-the production of diffusible, sharable iron-scavenging siderophore molecules. Z&amp;R posit that their findings challenge the view that siderophore production is a cooperative trait. Here, we demonstrate that their arguments are flawed, and stem from both technical mistakes and misunderstandings of social evolution theory.</dc:description>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://sonar.ch/global/documents/50559</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/evo.12311</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/24219572</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:source>Evolution; international journal of organic evolution. - 2014</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Cheating</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">environmental conditions</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">maladaptation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">public goods cooperation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">siderophore</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns6="xml" ns6:lang="en">social evolution theory</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns7="xml" ns7:lang="en">Biological Evolution</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns8="xml" ns8:lang="en">Oligopeptides</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns9="xml" ns9:lang="en">Pseudomonas</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns10="xml" ns10:lang="en">Explaining the sociobiology of pyoverdin producing Pseudomonas: a comment on Zhang and Rainey (2013).</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
