<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:creator>Weikert T</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Winkel DJ</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Bremerich J</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Stieltjes B</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Parmar V</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Sauter AW</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Sommer G</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
  <dc:description xmlns:ns0="xml" ns0:lang="en">OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the performance of an AI-powered algorithm for the automatic detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) on chest computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) on a large dataset.


METHODS
We retrospectively identified all CTPAs conducted at our institution in 2017 (n = 1499). Exams with clinical questions other than PE were excluded from the analysis (n = 34). The remaining exams were classified into positive (n = 232) and negative (n = 1233) for PE based on the final written reports, which defined the reference standard. The fully anonymized 1-mm series in soft tissue reconstruction served as input for the PE detection prototype algorithm that was based on a deep convolutional neural network comprising a Resnet architecture. It was trained and validated on 28,000 CTPAs acquired at other institutions. The result series were reviewed using a web-based feedback platform. Measures of diagnostic performance were calculated on a per patient and a per finding level.


RESULTS
The algorithm correctly identified 215 of 232 exams positive for pulmonary embolism (sensitivity 92.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-95.5%) and 1178 of 1233 exams negative for pulmonary embolism (specificity 95.5%; 95% CI 94.2-96.6%). On a per finding level, 1174 of 1352 findings marked as embolus by the algorithm were true emboli. Most of the false positive findings were due to contrast agent-related flow artifacts, pulmonary veins, and lymph nodes.


CONCLUSION
The AI prototype algorithm we tested has a high degree of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of PE on CTPAs. Sensitivity and specificity are balanced, which is a prerequisite for its clinical usefulness.


KEY POINTS
• An AI-based prototype algorithm showed a high degree of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pulmonary embolism on CTPAs. • It can therefore help clinicians to automatically prioritize exams with a high suspection of pulmonary embolism and serve as secondary reading tool. • By complementing traditional ways of worklist prioritization in radiology departments, this can speed up the diagnostic and therapeutic workup of patients with pulmonary embolism and help to avoid false negative calls.</dc:description>
  <dc:identifier>https://sonar.ch/global/documents/93630</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00330-020-06998-0</dc:relation>
  <dc:relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/32621243</dc:relation>
  <dc:source>European radiology. - 2020</dc:source>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns1="xml" ns1:lang="en">Artificial intelligence</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns2="xml" ns2:lang="en">Computed tomography angiography</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns3="xml" ns3:lang="en">Computer-assisted image processing</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xmlns:ns4="xml" ns4:lang="en">Pulmonary embolism</dc:subject>
  <dc:title xmlns:ns5="xml" ns5:lang="en">Automated detection of pulmonary embolism in CT pulmonary angiograms using an AI-powered algorithm.</dc:title>
  <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>
