Back
Response to "Comments on 'A field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise' " [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 2301-2311 (2010)] (L).
Journal article

Response to "Comments on 'A field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise' " [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 2301-2311 (2010)] (L).

  • Brink M ETH Zurich, D-MTEC Public and Organizational Health, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland. brink@ethz.ch
  • Wunderli JM
  • 2012-05-08
Published in:
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. - 2012
Environmental Exposure
Female
Firearms
Humans
Irritable Mood
Male
Military Personnel
Noise
English This letter is a response to Meyer's recent paper ["Comment on 'A field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise,' "J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 677-678 (2011)]. The authors describe that "explained variance" in noise annoyance surveys can mean different things and that the fit parameters of the statistical models reported in the commented article are well within an expectable range. It is discussed that non-dose-related factors for the prediction of noise annoyance have become increasingly important in the last years and deserve to be more thoroughly studied.
Language
  • English
Open access status
closed
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://sonar.ch/global/documents/143343
Statistics
Document views: 38 File downloads: