Response to

Brink M; Wunderli JM

doi:10.1121/1.3699263

Back

Journal article

Response to "Comments on 'A field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise' " [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 2301-2311 (2010)] (L).

Brink M ETH Zurich, D-MTEC Public and Organizational Health, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland. brink@ethz.ch
Wunderli JM

2012-05-08

Published in:

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. - 2012

English This letter is a response to Meyer's recent paper ["Comment on 'A field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise,' "J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 677-678 (2011)]. The authors describe that "explained variance" in noise annoyance surveys can mean different things and that the fit parameters of the statistical models reported in the commented article are well within an expectable range. It is discussed that non-dose-related factors for the prediction of noise annoyance have become increasingly important in the last years and deserve to be more thoroughly studied.

Language