Journal article

Visual Outcomes of Ultrathin-Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty

  • Droutsas, Konstantinos ORCID Department of Ophthalmology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
  • Petrelli, Myrsini ORCID First Department of Ophthalmology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
  • Miltsakakis, Dimitrios State Ophthalmology Clinic, General Hospital “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
  • Andreanos, Konstantinos First Department of Ophthalmology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
  • Karagianni, Anastasia State Ophthalmology Clinic, General Hospital “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
  • Lazaridis, Apostolos ORCID Department of Ophthalmology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
  • Koutsandrea, Chrysanthi First Department of Ophthalmology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
  • Kymionis, George Jules Gonin Eye Hospital, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Show more…
Published in:
  • Journal of Ophthalmology. - Hindawi Limited. - 2018, vol. 2018, p. 1-5
English Purpose. To examine the impact of graft thickness (GT) on postoperative visual acuity and endothelial cell density after ultrathin-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus conventional DSAEK. Methods. The medical records of all patients who underwent DSAEK at our institute during a 2-year period were reviewed. After excluding subjects with low visual potential, 34 eyes were divided into two groups based on the postoperative GT as measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT): an UT-DSAEK group (GT ≤ 100 μm, n=13 eyes) and a DSAEK group (GT > 100 μm, n=21 eyes). The groups were compared with regard to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subjective refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), GT, and endothelial cell density (ECD). Results. Preoperative BCVA (logMAR) was 1.035 ± 0.514 and 0.772 ± 0.428 for UT-DSAEK and DSAEK, respectively (P=0.072). At 6 months postoperatively, BCVA was 0.088 ± 0.150 following UT-DSAEK and 0.285 ± 0.158 following DSAEK (P=0.001). Conclusion. DSAEK grafts with a thickness under 100 μm offered better visual outcomes during the early postoperative period.
Language
  • English
Open access status
gold
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://sonar.ch/global/documents/149160
Statistics

Document views: 39 File downloads:
  • Full-text: 0