Journal article
PEEK versus titanium locking plates for proximal humerus fracture fixation: a comparative biomechanical study in two- and three-part fractures.
-
Schliemann B
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany. benedikt.schliemann@ukmuenster.de.
-
Seifert R
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
-
Theisen C
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
-
Gehweiler D
AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
-
Wähnert D
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
-
Schulze M
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
-
Raschke MJ
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
-
Weimann A
OCP-Münster, Schaumburgstraße 1, 48145, Münster, Germany.
Show more…
Published in:
- Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. - 2017
English
INTRODUCTION
The high rigidity of metal implants may be a cause of failure after fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (PEEK) plates with a modulus similar to human cortical bone may help to overcome this problem. The present study assesses the biomechanical behavior of a PEEK plate compared with a titanium locking plate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Unstable two- and three-part fractures were simulated in 12 pairs of cadaveric humeri and were fixed with either a PEEK or a titanium locking plate using a pairwise comparison. With an optical motion capture system, the stiffness, failure load, plate bending, and the relative motion at the bone-implant interface and at the fracture site were evaluated.
RESULTS
The mean load to failure for two- and three-part fracture fixations was, respectively, 191 N (range 102-356 N) and 142 N (range 102-169 N) in the PEEK plate group compared with 286 N (range 191-395 N) and 258 N (range 155-366 N) in the titanium locking plate group. The PEEK plate showed significantly more bending in both the two- and three-part fractures (p < 0.05), an increased relative motion at the bone-implant interface and lower stiffness values (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
In this biomechanical study on unstable proximal humerus fractures, fixation with a PEEK plate showed lower fixation strength and increased motion at the bone-implant interface compared with a titanium locking plate.
-
Language
-
-
Open access status
-
closed
-
Identifiers
-
-
Persistent URL
-
https://sonar.ch/global/documents/151833
Statistics
Document views: 15
File downloads: