PEEK versus titanium locking plates for proximal humerus fracture fixation: a comparative biomechanical study in two- and three-part fractures.
Journal article

PEEK versus titanium locking plates for proximal humerus fracture fixation: a comparative biomechanical study in two- and three-part fractures.

  • Schliemann B Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany. benedikt.schliemann@ukmuenster.de.
  • Seifert R Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  • Theisen C Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  • Gehweiler D AO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
  • Wähnert D Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  • Schulze M Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  • Raschke MJ Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, building W1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  • Weimann A OCP-Münster, Schaumburgstraße 1, 48145, Münster, Germany.
Show more…
  • 2016-12-23
Published in:
  • Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. - 2017
English INTRODUCTION
The high rigidity of metal implants may be a cause of failure after fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (PEEK) plates with a modulus similar to human cortical bone may help to overcome this problem. The present study assesses the biomechanical behavior of a PEEK plate compared with a titanium locking plate.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
Unstable two- and three-part fractures were simulated in 12 pairs of cadaveric humeri and were fixed with either a PEEK or a titanium locking plate using a pairwise comparison. With an optical motion capture system, the stiffness, failure load, plate bending, and the relative motion at the bone-implant interface and at the fracture site were evaluated.


RESULTS
The mean load to failure for two- and three-part fracture fixations was, respectively, 191 N (range 102-356 N) and 142 N (range 102-169 N) in the PEEK plate group compared with 286 N (range 191-395 N) and 258 N (range 155-366 N) in the titanium locking plate group. The PEEK plate showed significantly more bending in both the two- and three-part fractures (p < 0.05), an increased relative motion at the bone-implant interface and lower stiffness values (p < 0.05).


CONCLUSION
In this biomechanical study on unstable proximal humerus fractures, fixation with a PEEK plate showed lower fixation strength and increased motion at the bone-implant interface compared with a titanium locking plate.
Language
  • English
Open access status
closed
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://sonar.ch/global/documents/151833
Statistics

Document views: 15 File downloads: