Journal article
Human Enhancement
- Roduit, Johann A. R. University of Zurich, Switzerland & University of Oxford, UK & NeoHumanitas, Switzerland
- Menuz, Vincent University of Montreal, Canada & NeoHumanitas, Switzerland
- Baumann, Holger University of Zurich, Switzerland
Published in:
- Global Issues and Ethical Considerations in Human Enhancement Technologies. - IGI Global. - 2014, p. 54-66
English
Two major problems persist in the debate regarding the ethics of human enhancement. First, there is a lack of discussion and agreement on a definition of human enhancement. Second, the commonly used bioethical principles of justice, safety, and autonomy are jointly insufficient to assess the morality of human enhancement. This chapter attempts to define these problems and to propose a possible solution. Defending a qualitative definition of human enhancement, the authors suggest examining “perfectionist notions” of what it means to live a good human life in order to give additional normative tools to assess the morality of human enhancements. This chapter will help to clarify the debate and move it along by arguing that characteristics of the ideal human life, once defined and seen as the goal of human enhancement, can help assess the morality of a given human enhancement.
- Language
-
- English
- Open access status
- closed
- Identifiers
-
- DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-6010-6.ch004
- ISSN 2328-1316
- Persistent URL
- https://sonar.ch/global/documents/187805
Statistics
Document views: 15
File downloads: