Journal article
The effectiveness of avalanche airbags.
- Haegeli P Avisualanche Consulting, 2-250 E 15th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5T 2P9, Canada; School for Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. Electronic address: pascal@avisualanche.ca.
- Falk M Inova Q Inc., Tinkhauserstrasse 5b, 39031 Bruneck/Brunico, Italy.
- Procter E EURAC Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Drususallee 1, 39100 Bozen/Bolzano, Italy.
- Zweifel B WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, 7260 Davos, Switzerland.
- Jarry F National Association for Snow and Avalanche Studies (ANENA), 15 rue Ernest Calvat, 38000 Grenoble, France.
- Logan S Colorado Avalanche Information Center, 325 Broadway WS1, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
- Kronholm K Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI), Sognsveien 72, N-0855 Oslo, Norway.
- Biskupič M Avalanche Prevention Center, Jasná, 032 51 Demänovská Dolina, Slovakia; Institute for Environmental Studies, Charles University, Ovocný trh 3-5, 116 36 Praha 1, Czech Republic.
- Brugger H EURAC Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Drususallee 1, 39100 Bozen/Bolzano, Italy.
- 2014-06-10
Published in:
- Resuscitation. - 2014
Avalanche accidents
Burial prevention
Mortality
Safety equipment
Air Bags
Asphyxia
Avalanches
Humans
Multivariate Analysis
Retrospective Studies
English
AIM
Asphyxia is the primary cause of death among avalanche victims. Avalanche airbags can lower mortality by directly reducing grade of burial, the single most important factor for survival. This study aims to provide an updated perspective on the effectiveness of this safety device.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of avalanche accidents involving at least one airbag user between 1994 and 2012 in Austria, Canada, France, Norway, Slovakia, Switzerland and the United States. A multivariate analysis was used to calculate adjusted absolute risk reduction and estimate the effectiveness of airbags on grade of burial and mortality. A univariate analysis was used to examine causes of non-deployment.
RESULTS
Binomial linear regression models showed main effects for airbag use, avalanche size and injuries on critical burial, and for grade of burial, injuries and avalanche size on mortality. The adjusted risk of critical burial is 47% with non-inflated airbags and 20% with inflated airbags. The adjusted mortality is 44% for critically buried victims and 3% for non-critically buried victims. The adjusted absolute mortality reduction for inflated airbags is -11 percentage points (22% to 11%; 95% confidence interval: -4 to -18 percentage points) and adjusted risk ratio is 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.29 to 0.72). Overall non-inflation rate is 20%, 60% of which is attributed to deployment failure by the user.
CONCLUSION
Although the impact on survival is smaller than previously reported, these results confirm the effectiveness of airbags. Non-deployment remains the most considerable limitation to effectiveness. Development of standardized data collection protocols is encouraged to facilitate further research.
Asphyxia is the primary cause of death among avalanche victims. Avalanche airbags can lower mortality by directly reducing grade of burial, the single most important factor for survival. This study aims to provide an updated perspective on the effectiveness of this safety device.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of avalanche accidents involving at least one airbag user between 1994 and 2012 in Austria, Canada, France, Norway, Slovakia, Switzerland and the United States. A multivariate analysis was used to calculate adjusted absolute risk reduction and estimate the effectiveness of airbags on grade of burial and mortality. A univariate analysis was used to examine causes of non-deployment.
RESULTS
Binomial linear regression models showed main effects for airbag use, avalanche size and injuries on critical burial, and for grade of burial, injuries and avalanche size on mortality. The adjusted risk of critical burial is 47% with non-inflated airbags and 20% with inflated airbags. The adjusted mortality is 44% for critically buried victims and 3% for non-critically buried victims. The adjusted absolute mortality reduction for inflated airbags is -11 percentage points (22% to 11%; 95% confidence interval: -4 to -18 percentage points) and adjusted risk ratio is 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.29 to 0.72). Overall non-inflation rate is 20%, 60% of which is attributed to deployment failure by the user.
CONCLUSION
Although the impact on survival is smaller than previously reported, these results confirm the effectiveness of airbags. Non-deployment remains the most considerable limitation to effectiveness. Development of standardized data collection protocols is encouraged to facilitate further research.
- Language
-
- English
- Open access status
- closed
- Identifiers
-
- DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.05.025
- PMID 24909367
- Persistent URL
- https://sonar.ch/global/documents/208642
Statistics
Document views: 30
File downloads: