Clinical assessment of potential drug interactions of faldaprevir, a hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor, with darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz, and tenofovir.
-
Sabo JP
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ridgefield, Connecticut.
-
Kort J
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ridgefield, Connecticut.
-
Ballow C
Buffalo Clinical Research Center, New York.
-
Haschke M
University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
-
Battegay M
University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
-
Fuhr R
PAREXEL International GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
-
Girlich B
Boehringer Ingelheim (Schweiz) GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.
-
Schobelock M
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ridgefield, Connecticut.
-
Feifel U
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co KG, Ingelheim.
-
Lang B
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co KG, Biberach, Germany.
-
Li Y
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ridgefield, Connecticut.
-
Elgadi M
Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Show more…
Published in:
- Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. - 2014
English
BACKGROUND
Faldaprevir is a potent, once-daily hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor. Studies were performed to investigate potential drug interactions between faldaprevir and the commonly used antiretrovirals darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz, and tenofovir to guide the coadministration of faldaprevir with these agents in human immunodeficiency virus/HCV-coinfected patients.
METHODS
In 3 open-label, phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, healthy adult volunteers received (1) darunavir/ritonavir (800 mg/100 mg once daily) with and without faldaprevir (240 mg once daily); (2) faldaprevir (240 mg twice daily) with and without efavirenz (600 mg once daily); or (3) faldaprevir (240 mg twice daily) or tenofovir (300 mg once daily) alone and in combination. To assess potential drug interactions, geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for PK parameters were calculated. Safety was evaluated.
RESULTS
Efavirenz decreased faldaprevir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 35%, Cmax by 28%, and Cmin by 46%, consistent with induction of CYP3A by efavirenz. Tenofovir decreased faldaprevir AUC by 22%, which was not considered to be clinically relevant. Faldaprevir had no clinically relevant effects on darunavir or tenofovir PK (15% and 22% AUC increase, respectively). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles of faldaprevir and the antiretrovirals being examined.
CONCLUSIONS
No clinically significant interactions were observed between faldaprevir and darunavir/ritonavir or tenofovir. A potentially clinically relevant decrease in faldaprevir exposure was observed when coadministered with efavirenz; this decrease can be managed using the higher of the 2 faldaprevir doses tested in phase 3 trials (240 mg once daily as opposed to 120 mg once daily).
-
Language
-
-
Open access status
-
bronze
-
Identifiers
-
-
Persistent URL
-
https://sonar.ch/global/documents/232342
Statistics
Document views: 16
File downloads: