Back
Full-text
Journal article

Environmental Impact of Buildings--What Matters?

  • Heeren N †Institute of Environmental Engineering, Chair of Ecological System Design, ETH Zurich, John-von-Neumann-Weg 9, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Mutel CL ‡Technology Assessment Group (LEA), Paul Scherrer Institut, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland.
  • Steubing B †Institute of Environmental Engineering, Chair of Ecological System Design, ETH Zurich, John-von-Neumann-Weg 9, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Ostermeyer Y §Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Wallbaum H §Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Hellweg S †Institute of Environmental Engineering, Chair of Ecological System Design, ETH Zurich, John-von-Neumann-Weg 9, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Show more…
  • 2015-07-16
Published in:
  • Environmental science & technology. - 2015
Construction Materials
Environment
Housing
Models, Theoretical
Switzerland
Thermodynamics
Wood
English The goal of this study was to identify drivers of environmental impact and quantify their influence on the environmental performance of wooden and massive residential and office buildings. We performed a life cycle assessment and used thermal simulation to quantify operational energy demand and to account for differences in thermal inertia of building mass. Twenty-eight input parameters, affecting operation, design, material, and exogenic building properties were sampled in a Monte Carlo analysis. To determine sensitivity, we calculated the correlation between each parameter and the resulting life cycle inventory and impact assessment scores. Parameters affecting operational energy demand and energy conversion are the most influential for the building's total environmental performance. For climate change, electricity mix, ventilation rate, heating system, and construction material rank the highest. Thermal inertia results in an average 2-6% difference in heat demand. Nonrenewable cumulative energy demand of wooden buildings is 18% lower, compared to a massive variant. Total cumulative energy demand is comparable. The median climate change impact is 25% lower, including end-of-life material credits and 22% lower, when credits are excluded. The findings are valid for small offices and residential buildings in Switzerland and regions with similar building culture, construction material production, and climate.
Language
  • English
Open access status
hybrid
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://sonar.ch/global/documents/244544
Statistics
Document views: 42 File downloads:
  • Full-text: 0