Journal article
Validation of the Russian version of the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) for the detection of Bipolar II disorder in patients with a current diagnosis of recurrent depression.
- Mosolov SN Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Russia. Electronic address: psypharmamniip@gmail.com.
- Ushkalova AV Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Russia.
- Kostukova EG Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Russia.
- Shafarenko AA Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Russia.
- Alfimov PV Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Russia.
- Kostyukova AB Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Russia.
- Angst J Zurich University Psychiatric Hospital, Switzerland.
- 2013-11-16
Published in:
- Journal of affective disorders. - 2014
Bipolar II disorder
HCL-32
Hypomania
Recurrent Depressive Disorder
Russia
Adult
Bipolar Disorder
Depression
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Recurrence
Reproducibility of Results
Russia
Surveys and Questionnaires
English
BACKGROUND
There are no validated screening tools for Bipolar Disorder (BD) in Russia.
OBJECTIVE
To validate the Russian version of the HCL-32 for the detection of Bipolar II disorder (BD II) in patients with Recurrent Depressive Disorder (RDD).
METHODS
409 patients with a current diagnosis of RDD were recruited. The diagnosis was confirmed by the validated Russian version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Another investigator interviewed the patients using the НСL-32 questions.
RESULTS
The total HCL-32 score in patients with BD II was significantly higher than in patients with RDD: 18.2 (4.22) versus 10.85 (5.81) (p<0.001, d=1447). At the cut-off 14 points the sensitivity was 83.7%, specificity 71.9% (p<0.001). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.887 that means good internal consistency. The best discrimination was achieved with 8 items: decreased need for sleep, less shyness or inhibition, talkativeness, more jokes and puns, jumping thoughts distractibility, exhausting or irritating others and high and more optimistic mood. We proposed the reduced variant of the scale, that includes only these 8 variables, with sensitivity 90.5%, specificity 69.8% (AUC=0.88).
CONCLUSIONS
The Russian version of the HCL-32 displayed a good ratio of sensitivity to specificity and can be recommended as a validated screening instrument. An 8-item version of HCL needs further research.
LIMITATIONS
Limitations include the specific nature of the sample, the HCL-32 assessment carried out by a psychiatrist, no comparison with other BD screening scales. The results of the 8-item version may be sample and culture dependent.
There are no validated screening tools for Bipolar Disorder (BD) in Russia.
OBJECTIVE
To validate the Russian version of the HCL-32 for the detection of Bipolar II disorder (BD II) in patients with Recurrent Depressive Disorder (RDD).
METHODS
409 patients with a current diagnosis of RDD were recruited. The diagnosis was confirmed by the validated Russian version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Another investigator interviewed the patients using the НСL-32 questions.
RESULTS
The total HCL-32 score in patients with BD II was significantly higher than in patients with RDD: 18.2 (4.22) versus 10.85 (5.81) (p<0.001, d=1447). At the cut-off 14 points the sensitivity was 83.7%, specificity 71.9% (p<0.001). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.887 that means good internal consistency. The best discrimination was achieved with 8 items: decreased need for sleep, less shyness or inhibition, talkativeness, more jokes and puns, jumping thoughts distractibility, exhausting or irritating others and high and more optimistic mood. We proposed the reduced variant of the scale, that includes only these 8 variables, with sensitivity 90.5%, specificity 69.8% (AUC=0.88).
CONCLUSIONS
The Russian version of the HCL-32 displayed a good ratio of sensitivity to specificity and can be recommended as a validated screening instrument. An 8-item version of HCL needs further research.
LIMITATIONS
Limitations include the specific nature of the sample, the HCL-32 assessment carried out by a psychiatrist, no comparison with other BD screening scales. The results of the 8-item version may be sample and culture dependent.
- Language
-
- English
- Open access status
- closed
- Identifiers
-
- DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.029
- PMID 24230917
- Persistent URL
- https://sonar.ch/global/documents/251584
Statistics
Document views: 20
File downloads: