Is computerized cardiotocography useful in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction?
Journal article

Is computerized cardiotocography useful in monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction?

  • Bertrang Warncke A Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Zbären S Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Spitalzentrum Biel, Biel, Switzerland.
  • Bolla D Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SRO AG, Spital Langenthal, Langenthal, Switzerland.
  • Baumann M Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Mosimann B Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Surbek D Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Baud D Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Raio L Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Show more…
  • 2020-01-14
Published in:
  • The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. - 2020
English Objective: To assess the value of using computerized cardiotocography (cCTG) short-term variation (STV) for intrapartum monitoring in monochorionic twins (MC) complicated by selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR).Material and methods: All available cCTGs retrieved from computerized medical records of MC with sIUGR were retrospectively studied regarding the behavior of the STV. sIUGR was defined as intertwin estimated fetal weight (EFW) discordance of ≥20% with the abdominal circumference (AC) below the fifth percentile and/or the EFW of the smaller twin below the 10th percentile. The sIUGR classification system proposed by Gratacos et al. was used using types I-III on the basis of umbilical artery Doppler characteristics of the IUGR twin. The admission (entry) STV and final pre-delivery (last) STV values were analyzed. Cases with intrauterine demise, with structural or chromosomal abnormalities, with twin anemia polycythemia sequence (TAPS) and/or twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) were excluded.Results: During the study period, 64 consecutive cases were managed within our department. Thirty-two cases fulfilled the inclusion criteria for analysis. Mean gestational age at assessment and at delivery was 28.4 ± 2.7 and 31.5 ± 2.2 weeks, respectively. The entry STV and last STV before delivery were not statistically different (mean IUGR STV entry: 9.3 ± 3.4 ms versus last 8 ± 2.2 ms; p = .051; mean co-twin STV entry: 9.1 ± 2.8 ms versus last 9.2 ± 3 ms; p = .87). Neither was the sIUGR-type adjusted STV.Conclusions: In MC pregnancies complicated by sIUGR, the cCTG STV does not distinguish between fetuses, nor does it show differences in cases of fetal deterioration monitored by conventional CTG.
Language
  • English
Open access status
closed
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://sonar.ch/global/documents/285722
Statistics

Document views: 30 File downloads: