District magnitude and representation of the majority's preferences—a reply and new perspectives
csal
- Portmann, Marco University of Fribourg, Bd. de Pérolles 90, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Stadelmann, David University of Fribourg, Bd. de Pérolles 90, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Eichenberger, Reiner University of Fribourg, Bd. de Pérolles 90, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
-
2013
Published in:
- Public Choice. - Springer US; http://www.springer-ny.com. - 2013, vol. 154, no. 1-2, p. 149-151
English
We reply to the comment of John Carey and Simon Hix on our original contribution entitled "District Magnitude and Representation of the Majority's Preferences: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Popular and Parliamentary Votes” in Public Choice 151:585-610 (2012). District magnitude does not necessarily affect deviations between political representatives and their district voters in a strictly monotonic way but monotonicity is upheld for deviations between representatives and the national majority. We provide new perspectives and caution against evaluating electoral systems by focusing on individual politicians' behavior but neglecting aggregation effects
- Collections
- Language
-
- English
- Classification
- Social sciences
- License
-
License undefinedSpringer Science+Business Media New York, 2012
- Identifiers
-
- RERO DOC 311496
- SWISSBIB (NATIONALLICENCE)springer-10.1007/s11127-012-0038-6
- DOI 10.1007/s11127-012-0038-6
- Persistent URL
- https://sonar.ch/global/documents/306794
Statistics
Document views: 24
File downloads:
- Fulltext: 0