Adhesion behavior of conventional and high-translucent zirconia: Effect of surface conditioning methods and aging using an experimental methodology.
- Ruales-Carrera E Department of Dentistry, Center for Education and Research in Dental Implants (CEPID), Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
- Cesar PF Department of Dental Materials and Oral Biology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
- Henriques B Ceramic and Composite Materials Research Laboratory (CERMAT), Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
- Fredel MC Ceramic and Composite Materials Research Laboratory (CERMAT), Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
- Özcan M Dental Materials Unit, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Volpato CAM Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
- 2019-05-18
Published in:
- Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]. - 2019
adhesive cementation
high-translucent zirconia
microtensile bond strength
Dental Bonding
Dental Materials
Dental Stress Analysis
Materials Testing
Resin Cements
Stress, Mechanical
Surface Properties
Zirconium
English
OBJECTIVE
Evaluate the adhesive behavior of conventional and high-translucent zirconia after surface conditioning and hydrothermal aging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Conventional (ZrC) and high-translucent zirconia (ZrT) specimens were divided into six groups: without surface treatment (ZrC and ZrT), air-borne particle abrasion with 50-μm Al2 O3 sized particles (ZrC-AO and ZrT-AO), and tribochemical treatment with 30-μm silica modified Al2 O3 sized particles (ZrC-T and ZrT-T). Zirconia specimens were treated using an MDP-containing universal adhesive and bonded to two resins blocks with an adhesive luting cement. Microbar specimens with cross-sectioned areas of 1 mm2 were achieved. Half of the microbars were subjected to hydrothermal aging. Bond strength was evaluated by microtensile bond strength test and statistically evaluated by the Weibull analysis.
RESULTS
Roughness of the ZrC-AO and ZrT-AO groups were statistically higher. Bond strength analysis revealed higher bond strength for ZrC-AO and ZrC-T groups compared to ZrT-AO and ZrT-T, respectively. Mixed failure was the most frequent for the mechanically treated groups, while no cohesive failures were obtained.
CONCLUSION
Lower values of bond strength were obtained for the mechanically treated high-translucent zirconia groups when compared to their conventional zirconia counterparts. Mechanical surface treatment significantly improved the bond strength to conventional and high-translucent zirconia.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Mechanical surface treatment (air-borne particle abrasion or tribochemical treatment) associated with the use of universal adhesives containing MDP could provide a durable bonding to conventional and high-translucent zirconia.
Evaluate the adhesive behavior of conventional and high-translucent zirconia after surface conditioning and hydrothermal aging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Conventional (ZrC) and high-translucent zirconia (ZrT) specimens were divided into six groups: without surface treatment (ZrC and ZrT), air-borne particle abrasion with 50-μm Al2 O3 sized particles (ZrC-AO and ZrT-AO), and tribochemical treatment with 30-μm silica modified Al2 O3 sized particles (ZrC-T and ZrT-T). Zirconia specimens were treated using an MDP-containing universal adhesive and bonded to two resins blocks with an adhesive luting cement. Microbar specimens with cross-sectioned areas of 1 mm2 were achieved. Half of the microbars were subjected to hydrothermal aging. Bond strength was evaluated by microtensile bond strength test and statistically evaluated by the Weibull analysis.
RESULTS
Roughness of the ZrC-AO and ZrT-AO groups were statistically higher. Bond strength analysis revealed higher bond strength for ZrC-AO and ZrC-T groups compared to ZrT-AO and ZrT-T, respectively. Mixed failure was the most frequent for the mechanically treated groups, while no cohesive failures were obtained.
CONCLUSION
Lower values of bond strength were obtained for the mechanically treated high-translucent zirconia groups when compared to their conventional zirconia counterparts. Mechanical surface treatment significantly improved the bond strength to conventional and high-translucent zirconia.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Mechanical surface treatment (air-borne particle abrasion or tribochemical treatment) associated with the use of universal adhesives containing MDP could provide a durable bonding to conventional and high-translucent zirconia.
- Language
-
- English
- Open access status
- green
- Identifiers
-
- DOI 10.1111/jerd.12490
- PMID 31099974
- Persistent URL
- https://sonar.ch/global/documents/47554
Statistics
Document views: 28
File downloads:
- Full-text: 0