Evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: Osteology Foundation Consensus Report Part 2-Effects of hard tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant tissues.
- Schwarz F Department of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
- Giannobile WV Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Jung RE Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- 2018-03-03
Published in:
- Clinical oral implants research. - 2018
alveolar ridge augmentation
dental implant
peri-implant diseases
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Bone Transplantation
Consensus
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
Dental Implants
Esthetics, Dental
Gingiva
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Osteology
Periodontal Index
English
OBJECTIVES
One task of Working Group 1 at the 2nd Consensus Meeting of the Osteology Foundation was to comprehensively assess the effects of hard tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
One systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of hard tissue augmentation procedures included a total of eight studies (n = 12 publications). Consensus statements, clinical recommendations, and implications for future research were based on structured group discussions and plenary session approval.
RESULTS
After 1-10 years of follow- up, lateral bone augmentation procedures were associated with peri-implant tissue stability, as evidenced by minimal and non-significant changes in bleeding on probing, probing depth, and marginal bone levels. Case definitions based on clinical and radiographic parameters to differentiate peri-implant health from disease have been inconsistently employed in the studies investigated.
CONCLUSIONS
Lateral bone augmentation procedures are associated with peri-implant tissue stability on short-term (1-3 years) and midterm follow-ups to long-term (>3 years) follow-ups.
One task of Working Group 1 at the 2nd Consensus Meeting of the Osteology Foundation was to comprehensively assess the effects of hard tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
One systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of hard tissue augmentation procedures included a total of eight studies (n = 12 publications). Consensus statements, clinical recommendations, and implications for future research were based on structured group discussions and plenary session approval.
RESULTS
After 1-10 years of follow- up, lateral bone augmentation procedures were associated with peri-implant tissue stability, as evidenced by minimal and non-significant changes in bleeding on probing, probing depth, and marginal bone levels. Case definitions based on clinical and radiographic parameters to differentiate peri-implant health from disease have been inconsistently employed in the studies investigated.
CONCLUSIONS
Lateral bone augmentation procedures are associated with peri-implant tissue stability on short-term (1-3 years) and midterm follow-ups to long-term (>3 years) follow-ups.
- Language
-
- English
- Open access status
- hybrid
- Identifiers
-
- DOI 10.1111/clr.13109
- PMID 29498125
- Persistent URL
- https://sonar.ch/global/documents/50736
Statistics
Document views: 53
File downloads:
- Full-text: 0