Informal coercion as a neglected form of communication in psychiatric settings in Germany and Switzerland.
Elmer TDepartment of Development and Research in Nursing, Therapies and Social Work, Psychiatric Hospitals of the University of Basel, Switzerland; Chair of Social Networks, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Rabenschlag FDepartment of Development and Research in Nursing, Therapies and Social Work, Psychiatric Hospitals of the University of Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: Franziska.rabenschlag@upkbs.ch.
Schori DDirectorate of Nursing, Therapies and Social Work, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Switzerland.
Zuaboni GDepartment of Nursing Development, Private Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Kilchberg, Switzerland.
Kozel BNursing and Social Education Research Unit, University of Berne, Psychiatric Services, Berne, Switzerland.
Jaeger SCenters for Psychiatry Suedwuerttemberg, Clinic for Psychiatry und Psychotherapy I, University of Ulm, Germany.
Mahlke CDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Heumann KDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Theodoridou ADepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Centre for Acute Psychiatric Disorders, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Switzerland.
Jaeger MDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Centre for Acute Psychiatric Disorders, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Switzerland.
English
AIMS Informal coercion is a frequently used form of communication among mental health professionals to influence treatment outcomes. This study investigates the recognition, attitude, and application of different forms of informal coercion by mental health professionals.
METHODS Mental health professionals of five psychiatric institutions in Germany and Switzerland (n = 424) took part in an online survey assessing the recognition of, attitudes towards, and application of different forms of informal coercion.
RESULTS Mental health professionals did not recognize the extent of informal coercion adequately; especially stronger forms were underestimated. Recognition and application of informal coercion was predicted by attitudes towards coercion. Furthermore, there were differences between profession of participants regarding the recognition and application of informal coercion.
CONCLUSIONS It is important to realize that the extent of applied informal coercion in therapeutic communication is often not recognized by practitioners, although it might interfere with a sound therapeutic relationship.