Large Variability of Proanthocyanidin Content and Composition in Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia).
Malisch CSForage Production and Grassland Systems, Institute for Sustainability Sciences ISS, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland.
Lüscher AForage Production and Grassland Systems, Institute for Sustainability Sciences ISS, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland.
Baert NLaboratory of Organic Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Department of Chemistry, University of Turku , FI-20500 Turku, Finland.
Engström MTLaboratory of Organic Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Department of Chemistry, University of Turku , FI-20500 Turku, Finland.
Studer BForage Crop Genetics, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich , CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Fryganas CChemistry and Biochemistry Laboratory, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading , Reading RG6 6AT, United Kingdom.
Suter DForage Production and Grassland Systems, Institute for Sustainability Sciences ISS, Agroscope, Reckenholzstrasse 191, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland.
Mueller-Harvey IChemistry and Biochemistry Laboratory, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading , Reading RG6 6AT, United Kingdom.
Salminen JPLaboratory of Organic Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Department of Chemistry, University of Turku , FI-20500 Turku, Finland.
English
Proanthocyanidins (PAs) in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) are of interest to ameliorate the sustainability of livestock production. However, sainfoin forage yield and PA concentrations, as well as their composition, require optimization. Individual plants of 27 sainfoin accessions from four continents were analyzed with LC-ESI-QqQ-MS/MS for PA concentrations and simple phenolic compounds. Large variability existed in PA concentrations (23.0-47.5 mg g(-1) leaf dry matter (DM)), share of prodelphinidins (79-96%), and mean degree of polymerization (11-14) among, but also within, accessions. PAs were mainly located in leaves (26.8 mg g(-1) DM), whereas stems had less PAs (7.8 mg g(-1) DM). Overall, high-yielding plants had lower PA leaf concentrations (R(2) = 0.16, P < 0.001) and fewer leaves (R(2) = 0.66, P < 0.001). However, the results show that these two trade-offs between yield and bioactive PAs can be overcome.