Sequential Effects in SNARC.

Gökaydin D; Brugger P; Loetscher T

doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29337-2

Back

Journal article

Sequential Effects in SNARC.

Gökaydin D School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. dgokaydin@gmail.com.
Brugger P Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Loetscher T School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

2018-07-22

Published in:

Scientific reports. - 2018

English Small and large numbers are typically associated with the left and right side of space, respectively. We conducted an online version of the classical Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) paradigm in 604 subjects in order to analyse how previous trials and responses affect SNARC. Our results point to a strong inversion of number-space associations (left/large and right/small) when the last trial was incoherent - i.e. when a response with the left hand was made to a large number or vice-versa. In addition, we demonstrate that the congruency of trials beyond just the last two can influence SNARC, providing empirical support for an important assumption of a working memory account of spatial-numerical associations. Finally, we show that sequential effects in SNARC can be captured by a simple exponential filter, known to underpin sequential effects across a range of stimuli detection and perceptual two-alternative forced choice decision tasks. Our findings point to universal mechanisms responsible for the processing of sequences from perception to cognition.

Language