Journal article
Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Sampaio FBWR Master Program in Dentistry, Universidade Ibirapuera, São Paulo, Brazil.
- Özcan M Dental Materials Unit, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
- Gimenez TC Master Program in Dentistry, Universidade Ibirapuera, São Paulo, Brazil.
- Moreira MSNA Master Program in Dentistry, Universidade Ibirapuera, São Paulo, Brazil.
- Tedesco TK Master Program in Dentistry, Universidade Ibirapuera, São Paulo, Brazil.
- Morimoto S Master Program in Dentistry, Universidade Ibirapuera, São Paulo, Brazil.
- 2019-12-17
Published in:
- Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]. - 2019
ceramics
composite resin
inlays
survival analysis
systematic review
Ceramics
Composite Resins
Dental Porcelain
Dental Restoration Failure
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
English
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite inlays, onlays, and overlays manufactured according to different methods (CAD/CAM, pressable, and stratified). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for published articles. Risk of bias, data extraction, subgroup analysis, meta-analysis, and GRADE was performed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Prospective, retrospective, or RCT studies, without restriction of language, from 1983 to 2019, with follow-up ≥5 years, reporting survival rates were screened independently by two reviewers in accordance with eligibility criteria.
RESULTS
A total of 13 articles (12 for ceramic, one for indirect composite) met the inclusion criteria. No articles were included regarding crystalline ceramic. The estimated cumulative survival rate for CAD/CAM was 97% after 5 years and 89% after 10 years; for pressable was 95% after 5 years, and for stratified was 88% after 5 years and 93% after 10 years.
CONCLUSIONS
Regardless of the manufacturing method, vitreous ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays showed high survival, providing evidence that these restorations are a safe treatment.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Vitreous ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays showed high survival, regardless of the manufacturing method, providing evidence that these restorations are a safe treatment.
To evaluate the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite inlays, onlays, and overlays manufactured according to different methods (CAD/CAM, pressable, and stratified). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for published articles. Risk of bias, data extraction, subgroup analysis, meta-analysis, and GRADE was performed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Prospective, retrospective, or RCT studies, without restriction of language, from 1983 to 2019, with follow-up ≥5 years, reporting survival rates were screened independently by two reviewers in accordance with eligibility criteria.
RESULTS
A total of 13 articles (12 for ceramic, one for indirect composite) met the inclusion criteria. No articles were included regarding crystalline ceramic. The estimated cumulative survival rate for CAD/CAM was 97% after 5 years and 89% after 10 years; for pressable was 95% after 5 years, and for stratified was 88% after 5 years and 93% after 10 years.
CONCLUSIONS
Regardless of the manufacturing method, vitreous ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays showed high survival, providing evidence that these restorations are a safe treatment.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Vitreous ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays showed high survival, regardless of the manufacturing method, providing evidence that these restorations are a safe treatment.
- Language
-
- English
- Open access status
- closed
- Identifiers
-
- DOI 10.1111/jerd.12555
- PMID 31840412
- Persistent URL
- https://sonar.ch/global/documents/235967
Statistics
Document views: 93
File downloads: