Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Metrics as Potential Biomarkers for Survival in Glioblastoma.
Puig JImaging Research Unit, Institut de Diagnostic per la Imatge (IDI), Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Blasco GImaging Research Unit, Institut de Diagnostic per la Imatge (IDI), Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Daunis-I-Estadella PDepartment of Computer Science, Applied Mathematics, and Statistics, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Federau CDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alberich-Bayarri ÁBiomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Polytechnics and University Hospital, La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Biarnes CImaging Research Unit, Institut de Diagnostic per la Imatge (IDI), Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Nael KDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States of America.
Essig MDepartment of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Jain RDivision of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, United States of America.
Wintermark MDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States of America.
Pedraza SImaging Research Unit, Institut de Diagnostic per la Imatge (IDI), Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
English
OBJECTIVE Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is an MRI technique with potential applications in measuring brain tumor perfusion, but its clinical impact remains to be determined. We assessed the usefulness of IVIM-metrics in predicting survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
METHODS Fifteen patients with glioblastoma underwent MRI including spin-echo echo-planar DWI using 13 b-values ranging from 0 to 1000 s/mm2. Parametric maps for diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were generated for contrast-enhancing regions (CER) and non-enhancing regions (NCER). Regions of interest were manually drawn in regions of maximum f and on the corresponding dynamic susceptibility contrast images. Prognostic factors were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards analyses.
RESULTS We found that fCER and D*CER correlated with rCBFCER. The best cutoffs for 6-month survival were fCER>9.86% and D*CER>21.712 x10-3mm2/s (100% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity, 100% and 80% positive predictive values, and 80% and 100% negative predictive values; AUC:0.893 and 0.857, respectively). Treatment yielded the highest hazard ratio (5.484; 95% CI: 1.162-25.88; AUC: 0.723; P = 0.031); fCER combined with treatment predicted survival with 100% accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS The IVIM-metrics fCER and D*CER are promising biomarkers of 6-month survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.