Baroreflex Sensitivity and Blood Pressure Variability can Help in Understanding the Different Response to Therapy During Acute Phase of Septic Shock.
Journal article

Baroreflex Sensitivity and Blood Pressure Variability can Help in Understanding the Different Response to Therapy During Acute Phase of Septic Shock.

  • Carrara M Politecnico di Milano, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Milano, Italy.
  • Bollen Pinto B Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Baselli G Politecnico di Milano, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Milano, Italy.
  • Bendjelid K Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Ferrario M Politecnico di Milano, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Milano, Italy.
  • 2017-11-08
Published in:
  • Shock (Augusta, Ga.). - 2018
English BACKGROUND
Mean values of hemodynamic variables are poorly effective in evaluating an actual recovery of the short-term autonomic mechanisms for blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) regulation. The aim of this work is to analyze the response to therapy in the early phase of septic shock to verify possible associations between BP recovery and BP autonomic control.


METHODS
This is an ancillary study from the multicenter prospective observational trial Shockomics (NCT02141607). A total of 21 septic shock patients were studied at two time points during the acute phase of shock and were classified according to changes in SOFA score. Time series of BP components and HR were analyzed in time and frequency domain. Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was assessed, and a mathematical model for the decomposition of diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) oscillations was used to understand the different contributions of BRS and HR on peripheral vascular resistance control.


RESULTS
Only those patients, who significantly improved organ function (responders, R), showed an increase of mean value and low frequency (LF) power in BP time series. Fluid accumulation was higher in the non-responders (NR). BRS increased in NR and the model of DAP variability showed that the contribution of HR was highly reduced in NR.


CONCLUSIONS
Although patients reached the mean BP target of 65 mmHg, our analyses highlighted important differences in terms of autonomic nervous system control. BP variability, HR variability and baroreflex trends can add information to individual vital sign measure such as mean BP, and can help in understanding the responsiveness to the combination of symphatomimetic drugs and fluid therapy.
Language
  • English
Open access status
hybrid
Identifiers
Persistent URL
https://sonar.ch/global/documents/46484
Statistics

Document views: 48 File downloads: