Journal article
Automated detection of pulmonary embolism in CT pulmonary angiograms using an AI-powered algorithm.
- Weikert T Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. thomas.weikert@usb.ch.
- Winkel DJ Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- Bremerich J Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- Stieltjes B Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- Parmar V Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- Sauter AW Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- Sommer G Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- 2020-07-05
Published in:
- European radiology. - 2020
Artificial intelligence
Computed tomography angiography
Computer-assisted image processing
Pulmonary embolism
English
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the performance of an AI-powered algorithm for the automatic detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) on chest computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) on a large dataset.
METHODS
We retrospectively identified all CTPAs conducted at our institution in 2017 (n = 1499). Exams with clinical questions other than PE were excluded from the analysis (n = 34). The remaining exams were classified into positive (n = 232) and negative (n = 1233) for PE based on the final written reports, which defined the reference standard. The fully anonymized 1-mm series in soft tissue reconstruction served as input for the PE detection prototype algorithm that was based on a deep convolutional neural network comprising a Resnet architecture. It was trained and validated on 28,000 CTPAs acquired at other institutions. The result series were reviewed using a web-based feedback platform. Measures of diagnostic performance were calculated on a per patient and a per finding level.
RESULTS
The algorithm correctly identified 215 of 232 exams positive for pulmonary embolism (sensitivity 92.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-95.5%) and 1178 of 1233 exams negative for pulmonary embolism (specificity 95.5%; 95% CI 94.2-96.6%). On a per finding level, 1174 of 1352 findings marked as embolus by the algorithm were true emboli. Most of the false positive findings were due to contrast agent-related flow artifacts, pulmonary veins, and lymph nodes.
CONCLUSION
The AI prototype algorithm we tested has a high degree of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of PE on CTPAs. Sensitivity and specificity are balanced, which is a prerequisite for its clinical usefulness.
KEY POINTS
• An AI-based prototype algorithm showed a high degree of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pulmonary embolism on CTPAs. • It can therefore help clinicians to automatically prioritize exams with a high suspection of pulmonary embolism and serve as secondary reading tool. • By complementing traditional ways of worklist prioritization in radiology departments, this can speed up the diagnostic and therapeutic workup of patients with pulmonary embolism and help to avoid false negative calls.
To evaluate the performance of an AI-powered algorithm for the automatic detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) on chest computed tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) on a large dataset.
METHODS
We retrospectively identified all CTPAs conducted at our institution in 2017 (n = 1499). Exams with clinical questions other than PE were excluded from the analysis (n = 34). The remaining exams were classified into positive (n = 232) and negative (n = 1233) for PE based on the final written reports, which defined the reference standard. The fully anonymized 1-mm series in soft tissue reconstruction served as input for the PE detection prototype algorithm that was based on a deep convolutional neural network comprising a Resnet architecture. It was trained and validated on 28,000 CTPAs acquired at other institutions. The result series were reviewed using a web-based feedback platform. Measures of diagnostic performance were calculated on a per patient and a per finding level.
RESULTS
The algorithm correctly identified 215 of 232 exams positive for pulmonary embolism (sensitivity 92.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-95.5%) and 1178 of 1233 exams negative for pulmonary embolism (specificity 95.5%; 95% CI 94.2-96.6%). On a per finding level, 1174 of 1352 findings marked as embolus by the algorithm were true emboli. Most of the false positive findings were due to contrast agent-related flow artifacts, pulmonary veins, and lymph nodes.
CONCLUSION
The AI prototype algorithm we tested has a high degree of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of PE on CTPAs. Sensitivity and specificity are balanced, which is a prerequisite for its clinical usefulness.
KEY POINTS
• An AI-based prototype algorithm showed a high degree of diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pulmonary embolism on CTPAs. • It can therefore help clinicians to automatically prioritize exams with a high suspection of pulmonary embolism and serve as secondary reading tool. • By complementing traditional ways of worklist prioritization in radiology departments, this can speed up the diagnostic and therapeutic workup of patients with pulmonary embolism and help to avoid false negative calls.
- Language
-
- English
- Open access status
- closed
- Identifiers
-
- DOI 10.1007/s00330-020-06998-0
- PMID 32621243
- Persistent URL
- https://sonar.ch/global/documents/93630
Export to…
Statistics
Document views: 69
File downloads: